Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
@0xfoobar — there’s a proposal from @sanjay and @horsefacts.eth to support verifications from delegate, curious if you have thoughts on the implementation https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/109
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions
foobar
@0xfoobar
One thing I'd add that you might not be aware of (since it didn't exist in V1) is subdelegation rights. Users can delegate for a specific usecase without delegating their entire wallet, as some might want. Just a matter of using a specific bytestring for the `rights` param, I'd recommend "warpcast"
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
foobar
@0xfoobar
Checks are still dead-simple, one function. `checkDelegateForAll(hotWallet, accountOwner, "warpcast")` returns true if people have delegated that specific rights string or if they've delegated the empty rights string. So granularity doesn't add complexity for integrators.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
foobar
@0xfoobar
More details here: https://docs.delegate.xyz/delegate/upgrade-to-v2/subdelegations
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
danrosario.eth
@danr
Bumping this @sanjay @horsefacts.eth @v @dwr.eth Does delegate work with WC?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
dark horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Not yet, but it's possible to extend verifications to support it. Last time we checked (several months ago) we found very few linked accounts using Delegate. That may have changed along with a lot of things in the past week!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
danrosario.eth
@danr
Id bet it’s worth a second look. With Twitter deprecating NFT support, there is an opportunity to attract users that care about the digital flex without compromising wallet security. Not to mention the questionable opsec encouraged rn. We literally had a Frame asking for users to enter their seed phrase 😂
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
danrosario.eth
@danr
…Delegate wouldn’t solve reckless behavior, but it’s one step towards better security practices
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
