Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
@0xfoobar — there’s a proposal from @sanjay and @horsefacts.eth to support verifications from delegate, curious if you have thoughts on the implementation https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/109
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions

foobar pfp
foobar
@0xfoobar
One thing I'd add that you might not be aware of (since it didn't exist in V1) is subdelegation rights. Users can delegate for a specific usecase without delegating their entire wallet, as some might want. Just a matter of using a specific bytestring for the `rights` param, I'd recommend "warpcast"
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

foobar pfp
foobar
@0xfoobar
Checks are still dead-simple, one function. `checkDelegateForAll(hotWallet, accountOwner, "warpcast")` returns true if people have delegated that specific rights string or if they've delegated the empty rights string. So granularity doesn't add complexity for integrators.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

foobar pfp
foobar
@0xfoobar
More details here: https://docs.delegate.xyz/delegate/upgrade-to-v2/subdelegations
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

danrosario.eth pfp
danrosario.eth
@danr
Bumping this @sanjay @horsefacts.eth @v @dwr.eth Does delegate work with WC?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Not yet, but it's possible to extend verifications to support it. Last time we checked (several months ago) we found very few linked accounts using Delegate. That may have changed along with a lot of things in the past week!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Sanjay pfp
Sanjay
@sanjay
Not right now
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction