Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
@0xfoobar — there’s a proposal from @sanjay and @horsefacts.eth to support verifications from delegate, curious if you have thoughts on the implementation https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/109
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions

foobar pfp
foobar
@0xfoobar
One thing I'd add that you might not be aware of (since it didn't exist in V1) is subdelegation rights. Users can delegate for a specific usecase without delegating their entire wallet, as some might want. Just a matter of using a specific bytestring for the `rights` param, I'd recommend "warpcast"
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

foobar pfp
foobar
@0xfoobar
Checks are still dead-simple, one function. `checkDelegateForAll(hotWallet, accountOwner, "warpcast")` returns true if people have delegated that specific rights string or if they've delegated the empty rights string. So granularity doesn't add complexity for integrators.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

accountless pfp
accountless
@accountless.eth
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🥷🥷🥷
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction