Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
"Warpcast needs to do a better job with threads" What does that concretely mean? How is X / Twitter better? e.g.
37 replies
2 recasts
75 reactions
Vladyslav Dalechyn
@dalechyn.eth
I don't see anything wrong with threads on WC except for 2-level deep casts don't show metadata nor "Show more" so I might miss an interesting discussion. I see "Show more" as "more replies to level 1 cast" here ted's level 1, your's level 2. i can figure. gonna continue on the UX in a thread here.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vladyslav Dalechyn
@dalechyn.eth
here I clicked "Show more" once. I wanted to see if ted replied to the next cast of yours. I'm still not sure if there's even any answer.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vladyslav Dalechyn
@dalechyn.eth
now, clicking on "Show more" again finally shows ted's reply. what's logically broken to me is that: 1. ted's reply wasn't first, as level 1 cast replies were surfaced the first. although I was more interested in level 2 cast reply from ted as you started a dialogue. 2. "Replying to @dwr.eth" seems like a hack to not fall into multi-depth tree like cast conversation that converts the thing into a reddit like experience (can't say I don't like it though, it's ok) Either of those have to be improved imo.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction