what if existing AMMs aren't optimized for low-liquidity tokens?

and we gonna see liquidity naturally migrate from one AMM to another

i’m just getting into AMM now, so please let me know if i am understanding this correctly.

you are saying this for the use case:
liquidity providers do not have to lock up as much capital to prop up the price? 

The promise is still there for BIDs, but this statement implies liquidity is provided on an ‘as needed basis’, thus allowing the providers to more strategically use money when it’s not needed.

just inviting people to a thought experiment.

“for BIDs” you mean an onchain orderbook here?

for me, dynamic fees (v4 hook) based on the volume seem game changing.

check out constant sum and constant product amms (and other possible derivatives of constant function amms)

Meteora and Uniswap as good examples

i appreciate the invite

yes hmm the minimal knowledge i have is for how on chain orderbooks work, and i was trying to connect the two

but this seems like offchain pair management… hmm so the only connection i have is the formula x*y=k

i will have to read up more on these uniswap algos. it seems complicated to me if i don’t know how to implement it myself.

kudos to you for understanding