0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Many things on my mind:
- quality of engagement was, and is, far better than on X
- With 438 followers (246 by Warpcast measurements) I had incoming engagement from 85 casters (2 bots, 48 label-0, 12 label-1, 21 label-2, 1 no data). I removed the bots from the dataset.
- Two important drivers of engagement seems to be (a no-brainer) following and following back.
- 12.4% of the engagement is a 2-label, and 76.9% is a 0-label. With the remark that I don't get notifications for 2-labels. A factor 6.2 between spam-no spam. Seems good to me.
- Still worried about the overall number of quality engagement on Farcaster. It's a very small community, but on the other hand that gives it, it's vibe. Even when you don't follow each other, you still recognize relevant casters.
- Channels, and following feeds works better for me to find relevant casters to interact with than an algorithmic home-feed.
- Mixed feelings about Amps, in relation to engagement (l like experiments, but it makes the paid recaster less reliable imo) 2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
