Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Coop pfp
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
We value crypto projects by the amount of ETH locked inside a product or protocol. Then we value its native token as a multiple on that ETH locked. Now - does that ETH or token need to actually do anything? For all intensive purposes... no. Strange world we live in.
5 replies
2 recasts
119 reactions

Chinmay πŸ•ΉοΈπŸΏ pfp
Chinmay πŸ•ΉοΈπŸΏ
@chinmay.eth
These are speculative valuations. This is exactly how stocks were valued in the early days.
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction

↑ antaur ツ pfp
↑ antaur ツ
@antaur.eth
What if what it 'does' is acting as a magnet creating a magnetic field Good LPs = attracting attention, energy, intention etc. for long-term Bad LPs= repelling the above too fast and trapping toxic energies Not well thought out, but how does this resonate?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zenigame pfp
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
This just means we're still early (unironically) cause we're using a rough proxy metric to measure value.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

car πŸš—  pfp
car πŸš—
@cxs
Feels like we’re playing high stakes poker with these valuations Curious to see if it evolves to prioritize functional utility and real-world applications, or will speculative metrics continue to dominate
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Apurv pfp
Apurv
@apurvkaushal
For at least some products though ( Base with native yield etc.) , it does make sense as its like a treasury generating real returns on the investment. And # active wallets is a better metric for other consumer facing products imo ( excluding bots which is tough..)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction