androidsixteen 🌲
@androidsixteen.eth
It surprises me that we hold such an anachronistic view of evolution -- ie. seeing it as a mechanical process ("only optimizes for survival and replication") Humans cannot engineer an evolutionary process for consciousness better than nature because we lack a systemic view https://x.com/brian_armstrong/status/1907190962125938734
5 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
Cooki
@cooki
how else should we view evolution? I think that’s the right way to view it, why is this wrong?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
azb
@azbest
I think it's a good way to view it (as in: it's useful and easy to understand approximation), but it doesn't mean that we shouldn't try to transcend the evolutionary baggage. Certainly, there are more pressing issues in that regard than just optimizing reproduction.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
androidsixteen 🌲
@androidsixteen.eth
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/09/magazine/beauty-evolution-animal.html In my view, consciousness is primary and one way it expresses itself is through beauty, which itself is a proxy for truth: https://warpcast.com/androidsixteen.eth/0xaa915b8b Natural selection and other prior theories of evolution originated in the industrial era, lending to a more mechanical view of the processes (and a more brutish view of nature)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction