Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
some product x interoperability reflections after using @paragraph for submitting most of my /firstdrafts and reading others. thoughts? 1. i yearn for an inline reading experience native to warpcast. the current read inline frame isn't optimal and i've found myself clicking out more frequently these days (esp because substack / twitter UX is so seamless) cc @v what happened to that FIP? 2. to encourage both consumption and discussion, i want to share highlighted texts (quotes) from paragraph — not mint them. i would like to highlight text from paragraph and then share the highlighted text as a quote in an customizable image-based frame (jpeg quotes are popular across all socials) that either links to the article or makes the quote mintable or both. better for virality, as well. 3. i would "subscribe" to an author to support them vs. mint their article; in an ideal world, paragraph would use @hypersub to accomplish this (esp as authors become more multidimensional "creators")
11 replies
4 recasts
97 reactions
Colin
@colin
Really appreciate the detailed & thoughtful feedback. 1. Agreed. We can improve the read inline frame, but without the FIP or a Paragraph mini-app or other fundamental changes to FC/WC we won't be able to get to the Twitter UX level of on-platform reading 2. This is a great idea, something we've talked about, and something we definitely want to do 3. We need to think more deeply about how memberships can fit into the overarching Mirror + Paragraph ecosystem. We've chatted with @nonlinear.eth a few times about a potential Hypersub <> Paragraph integration; it's always just a matter of prioritization & roadmap
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
