Paragraph

my thinking here is token gated experiences, yes

token gated content, not really. but when participation in a cool experience is a tokenholder-specific action then you get something interesting

primitive example: anyone can !attack north but holders of the south nft get a boost on their attacks

I think this is an interesting take. We support token-gated access on Paragraph but it hasn’t gotten as much usage as collectible content.

Curious if we can find other ways to use NFTs on Paragraph beyond just gated access, eg..

- receive newsletters earlier 
- commenting privileges 
- revenue share
- ??

cma.xyz. Founder /paragraph, ceo /mirror, previously at Google & Coinbase 

Substack has an option for comments to be for paid subscribers only – I can see that being a perk, although I also really like the comments being pulled in from FC

Web3 newsletters & publishing.

We automatically summarize and cast about the best posts on Paragraph.

Interested in social infrastructure (URL & IRL) | slowly building /firstdraft, curating /concretejungle | markfishman.xyz

I think token gated commenting power makes more sense for channels than newsletters, because I agree, I think we get so few comments on newsletter posts as is, being able to pull comments from farcaster social graph is a huge perk to @paragraph inspiring public discourse

/cal 

Photographer, Artist, Web3 Educator, IP Lawyer, Patent Agent, Explorer 📸⛰️✨ 

 Building /flowcast with /mindfulness 🌊

https://wanderloots.com/links

Yeah, I also think this wouldn’t get substantial usage / be a great incentive

I think it makes sense if you have a huge publication and following, because then you limit the response “obligation” of the poster to a smaller subset of their community. 

But for smaller creators, there’s not enough momentum for that value to flywheel sustainably