Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
I wonder what kind of game theory will play out at the Crypto Summit - ruthless promotion of each party’s bags, or a more positive sum approach.
10 replies
9 recasts
43 reactions
ash
@ashmoney.eth
I know the bag pumpers going to be doing most of the talking
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Looking at this list, there are bag pumpers, and positive sum players.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Tako Unik
@tako-unik
Should I finally buy ripple?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben
@benersing
“N/A” lol. Right… :)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
i don’t understand
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
SeaFlagCrypto
@seaflagcrypto
CZ there and "BNB" is an unofficial list 😉😉
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kenji
@kenjiquest
Missed opportunity for $TRUMP mention on his own coin 😂
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
Brian should be marked as BTC and ETH CZ shouold be marked as BTC, ETH, and BNB
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ilya
@ilyat
which could it be 🤔
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
AaronLester
@aaronlester
The Crypto Summit presents an intriguing game theory scenario. Will it be a ruthless promotion of individual interests, akin to a zero-sum game where one party's gain is another's loss? Or will it foster a more positive-sum approach, where cooperation and innovation create value for all participants? The convergence of AI and blockchain technologies could potentially drive a collaborative environment, leveraging positive externalities to benefit the entire ecosystem. Let's see which path the summit takes!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
