It feels like there’s a non-zero chance that Google stops indexing pages that are provably produced by AI.

Am I off base here? Could there be a fracturing of the internet? 

The potential groundwork for a seismic shift is seemingly being laid, and we should probs talk about it.

🟪 #7 | Co-founder @survey | @ponder | Ex   | colinjohnson.io

it's a non-zero chance but it's like P of .001. many of their results are already produced by an AI (e.g. their page summaries).

They'll continue indexing, they'll just downweight the ai results

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

It just scares me that both image and copy generation are SO flooded by users, even months after their launch. 

If the hurdle for generating decent content becomes so low that an additional 1bn people will start producing it at a cost of *free, there have to be serious negative search implications.

I don't think it's a problem. Look, you didn't create English and the language constrains and guides your self expression.

So everything you end up publishing — having passed through the filter of "is this grammatically correct?" — is an indirect expression of your thoughts.

Same with LLMs, just once more indirec