Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What is the most frustrating thing about Farcaster right now? Reply and like the replies from others that resonate. I’ll only ask clarifying questions (ie I won’t tell you you’re wrong) and then respond to a dozen or so top answers in a video this weekend with how we think about it.
103 replies
110 recasts
599 reactions
Colin Johnson ðŸ’
@cojo.eth
1. The protocol should theoretically allow for simple transactions to be seamless and they are not. Kind of a crypto problem. 2. Scanning channels is burdensome, making #3 worse 3. My actions create a worse algo. I’ll like casts to support people or because I’m influenced by their momentum. I’d like an aspirational feed rather than a reflective feed.
2 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
What would an aspirational feed look like?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Colin Johnson ðŸ’
@cojo.eth
It’s probably easier to describe the negative cycle: -> I like something just barely enough to hit the like button. B- content but someone I’m familiar with -> That person casts way more frequently than those with A+ content, so I end up liking these more. -> I’m sent into a B- flywheel, and then feel bad about my choices.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Colin Johnson ðŸ’
@cojo.eth
Could be a skill issue, but ultimately it makes me less excited about my feed. I think I’m partial to over-liking things because it feels better for the protocol. An aspirational feed might be tethered to some declared interests that always maintain more weight than simple likes.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
