Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
This week I built the backend logic for Uvio's user reputation metrics. Since this is all backend, there isn't too much to see. What you can see though is the amount of pull requests we crushed. Some more in depth info. Uvio is information markets for everyone. The basis of Uvio's information markets is onchain reputation. We need to keep track of how right and how honest users are. Those two metrics get fed back into the system at the maximum and final stage of Claim disputes. Uvio's information markets start out public and decentralized. As Claims may get disputed, the audience grows wider and the stakes get higher. But ultimately, if the community can just not come to consensus by itself, at the final stage, the users with the highest degree of competence and the highest degree of integrity get selected to vote on the final dispute. If you read this far, you deserve to login to Uvio and get your signup bonus of UVX tokens on the Base testnet. Go get your reputation right, onchain.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
this is great,.., i threw up a troll post as a test
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
The troll post in question below. 😅 Thanks for using the platform! When I saw it I wanted to engage but I am personally missing a bit of more reasoning behind this Claim that would allow me to participate on either side. As it is right now it's a bit too dark for me to be reasoned with. Feel free to propose more interesting Claims and please let me know if something doesn't work or if there is something that we should implement.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
No problem, I was trying to make it funny but failed lol.I was looking for either a villain quote or something absurd/controversial that no one agrees with. The reasoning side is exactly what should be implemented. Users should be able to associate reasons with proposals, by which people can vote on reasons or values even, rather than the topic itself. So that the voting process itself informs people.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
That is a super interesting idea. Where do the reasons come from in the screenshot above? Is this some AI generated summary based on user comments or would there be a more structured interface to allow for this kind of grouping?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
Full disclosure, this is something a friend and I thought a lot about, and we’re working towards building this for our DAO. i totally support y’all in your effort, and look forward to seeing uvio grow.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
Maybe you guys could tell me more about the needs that your DAO has. I would like to enable you to make better decisions using Uvio in whatever governance architecture you prefer. Uvio provides the atomic method of decision making itself. So you can leverage Uvio's two-step decision making process of staking and voting in any governance framework. I have a talk prepared for other institutions that are interested in Uvio Information Markets. If you like I can run you guys through it. FYI this presentation is not yet published in the docs.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
Mate, I’m sorry, we would love to use your service for our DAO, but must disappoint. We have some core values / reasons we would associate with this proposal… that inhibit our ability to use Uvio.. Our most core-est value is decentralization, to the point of maximalism, and a derivative is the need to be completely dependency-less… which means, all data/code must be built from ground zero. That being said, we’re both going for similar things, and it’d be awesome if we could better understand/support each other; Would love to hear the presentation you have cooked up.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bloke
@cloaked-bloke
had to get bad news out right away.. apologies.. but still can see myself and others using uvio itself!!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
