Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
christopher
@christopher
It kinda feels like Warpcast is ready to be public by default, no account, shareable with any link. Anyone else feel this way? This is a tough-to-sell visual value prop (and is circa nearly a year ago).
9 replies
1 recast
62 reactions
dawufi
@dawufi
we let too much riff raff in ban everyone FID 6809 and over number randomly selected
1 reply
0 recast
13 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We had a feed on the logged out page and it converted worse. Maybe worth revisiting.
1 reply
1 recast
10 reactions
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
if the browser was already sybil-resistant, yes. but I can also imagine someone deploying mikumikubeam, so idk if we can have nice things.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zach
@zachterrell
wait you have to have an account to view this website?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Roadu 🎩🦊
@roadu
also shouldnt need to be logged into an account to access the frames dev portal, that should be publically accessible and if they arent logged in use a demo dwr account like in the framev1 local testing tool
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
📡 ZACH HARRIS 🛰️
@zachharris.eth
I totally agree and also think that some public links could have a word of mouth coefficient effect Port over curious CT by scratching various itches based on pretty simple adjacent content… Imagine a landing page with the cast embedded plus, an example of a bot, frame, and action + a collection of who to follow and a gift invite.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chris Carlson
@chrislarsc.eth
i feel like i visited channels more often with those big circles at the top
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jd 🌺
@jdl
agreed
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
helladj™
@helladj.eth
Ya 20 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
