Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/college-bb
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
christopher
@christopher
“Duke is in a position to compete for its sixth national championship thanks to a group of high net worth donors who have chosen to operate in a way that makes them unique in the braggadocious world of college sports—by conducting their business from the shadows …” “The collective’s membership has been kept small on purpose, too, Baker says. After hearing stories about donors who tried to interfere with team decision making or had strings tied to their capital, OVFF wanted a tightly held group that was happy to invest passively and trust in Scheyer to run the team.” @tldr this sounds like the vision of Bracket in the early days? Carolina has taken a far more transparent process with Carolina NIL https://www.wsj.com/sports/basketball/duke-cooper-flagg-nil-collective-ncaa-tournament-final-four-196aa6b1?mod=RSSMSN
5 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
christopher
@christopher
https://carolinanil.com/
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Yes man! When we get more fans using and the capital flowing, we do want to unlock fanbase ability to influence teams transparently Everybody was excited by this idea but it’s just super hard to get the initial accumulation and coordination going Thanks for sharing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
ironic that the reporter for this article went to duke
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
This raises a bigger question… will NIL collectives work better as exclusive investor clubs or open, community driven efforts? What do you think?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Blake
@blakefinucane
I feel like I need to subscribe to WSJ just to read this article
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
