Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
etherscan/basescan/[insert]scan is so miserable. if i send money to an ens, i have to first scan: txn hash status block timestamp how is "sent 100 USDC to user.eth" not the first fucking thing i see?!
8 replies
2 recasts
60 reactions

ChristianØ pfp
ChristianØ
@christian
Finally someone gets this. The ideal UX is a simple description of what the transaction did, followed by an optional "more details" section. And unfortunately with Etherscan and many others, it's the reverse. This is the exact reason we built /noves. And we will integrate chain by chain if we have to, to make this shift for the industry.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

ChristianØ pfp
ChristianØ
@christian
p.s. @0xdesigner, try our Chrome Extension, you'll never have this issue again. On Etherscan, BaseScan or whatever [blockchain]Scan you normally use.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction