Chris Carlson
@chrislarsc.eth
Not a huge fan of seeing a bunch of news reported on here. I much prefer consuming news on my own terms and not in my social feed. I think it’s great that journalists are here, but the content is just not for me in this context.
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
patxol
@patxol.eth
News are required in a social media feed if you want stickiness. Twitter is my best fresh news provider.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
I think just having journalists here is too aggressive a pattern match on what makes X successful. BUT if the Farconomy ends up creating a new way to fund journalism, that’s where it gets differentiated and interesting. And I wonder if the team realizes this given the weekly rewards.
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Goksu Toprak
@gt
I would expect your home feed to be free of this content if you are not following the authors? Is that not the case? Or is this more of a meta comment? (Asking as it helps us to understand how feeds work at scale)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
allgoodnoworries
@onchainalyssa
Feel like a lot of what we’re seeing should be posted in /news, (or whatever that channel might be) but if it’s surfacing everywhere, that’s more of a discovery issue than a problem with journalists joining. Personally, I welcome it—quality journalism is more valuable than ever in an AI-driven world. To me it seems to be merely a matter of using channels correctly so everyone can curate their experience. More human-driven reporting is a net positive here—just my hot take.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
