. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
Ethereum App Builders Roundtable #5 Highlights featuring Ledger & Alchemy We covered security, account abstraction, smart wallets, and the future of Ethereum UX "Ethereum Has Its Swagger Back" - @noam 1/15 🧵👇 https://x.com/i/spaces/1yNxaLEwoRjJj
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
2/15 🧵 Ledger’s ERC-7730: Making Transactions Human-Readable - Many users blindly sign hashes, leading to massive exploits (Bybit's $1.4B) - ERC-7730 introduces a metadata registry so wallets can display transactions in plain English, preventing phishing and malware attacks
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
3/15 🧵 How ERC-7730 Works - Developers submit metadata files describing smart contract functions. - Ledger signs and verifies them to ensure integrity. Wallets fetch this data so users see exactly what they are signing
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
4/15🧵Security First - Attackers are getting more sophisticated. Malware can modify transactions before signing - ERC-7730 ensures users see what they are about to sign. Ledger is making this a public good that any wallet can integrate
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
5/15🧵 Ecosystem Integration - Dapp devs need to submit metadata files for smart contracts - Wallets can integrate ERC-7730 to provide safer signing experiences - Future plans include support for nested transactions and proxy contracts
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
6/15🧵 Alchemy’s Smart Accounts Push - Ethereum is transitioning to account abstraction for better security and UX - Alchemy provides plug-and-play smart wallets. Supports both EIP-7702 (temporary delegation) and ERC-4337 (full smart accounts)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
7/15🧵 EIP-7702 vs. ERC-4337 - 7702 converts EOAs into smart accounts, but the original key always retains control - 4337 fully replaces EOAs with smart accounts, removing the single point of failure. If security is a priority, 4337 is preferred
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
8/15🧵 Why Smart Accounts Matter - No more seed phrases - Enables gasless transactions and session keys - More secure recovery options
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
9/15🧵 Challenges in Adoption - Many devs are unfamiliar with the new account models - Dapps need to update their signing methods, such as supporting EIP-6492 for counterfactual addresses - ERC-4337 transactions are bundled, so new infra is needed to parse them
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
10/15🧵 Ethereum’s 2025 Vision - Pectra brings EIP-7702 and increases blob capacity, which is huge for rollups - Ethereum is scaling while improving security. Fusaka (PeerDAS) will further enhance data availability
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
11/15🧵 Alchemy’s "Everyone Onchain Fund" - Grants to help devs integrate smart accounts and rollups - Gas sponsorship for user transactions - Free tooling to make adoption easier
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
12/15🧵 Ethereum Adoption Is Accelerating - Large companies outside of crypto are looking at Ethereum - Institutional interest is rising post-regulatory clarity, such as the stablecoin act - Alchemy sees demand for custom execution environments on rollups
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
13/15🧵 Rollups and Smart Accounts Are Converging - Worldcoin uses priority block space for humans - Combines ERC-4337 with signature aggregation for efficient inclusion - Rollup builders can customize execution while staying Ethereum-secure
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
14/15🧵 "Ethereum Has Its Swagger Back" - @noam - Dev momentum is high - 2025 will be a defining year for UX, security, and adoption - With smart accounts, data availability improvements, and infra upgrades, things are just getting started
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

. pfp
.
@chaskin.eth
15/15 🧵 Huge thanks to Ledger, Alchemy, and all the builders pushing Ethereum forward Want to get involved with ERC-7730 or smart accounts? Reach out
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction