if we believe in an onchain future where things are tokenized, we need to tokenize more things.

I appreciate and agree with the end state y'all are driving towards, but it feels like you're not listening to the market on this one

Ironically, the whole point of tokenization is to create more efficient markets

how do we get to the end state without tokenizing more things

By having a fair launch, we know how to avoid this (https://x.com/PopPunkOnChain/status/1912611070008828412)

You guys know this (https://x.com/davidtsocy/status/1893724021646069998)

Could also have a Dutch auction. Do we want to reward creators or train people to ape into tweets?

Base token on Zora was HORRIFICALLY sniped.

From a quick look, here's 2 wallets that purchased 21% of the supply for 2 ETH.

They then transferred to other wallets and sold for $300k profit.

This is what can happen if you don't have snipe protection... https://t.co/FT4kNWPtoQ

Pop Punk

1/ This week’s 🧭 spotlight: @flaunchgg built by @0xCaps, @0xnobi, and @0xToes

Redefining token launches - ƒlaunch is where devs get revs and traders get buybacks

A Thread 🧵 https://t.co/XLswRIrEEz

Launch fun and fair coins with @flaunchgg by @0xCaps, @0xnobi, and @0xToes

When a new coin is launched, there’s a 30 min fixed price window before entering price discovery – then, Flaunch takes zero trading fees, instead giving it all back to the token dev and community

Flaunch

David Tso (dave.base.eth)

/ethereum foundation | opinions are my own but more than likely they come from Vitalik's blog paragraph.xyz/@chaskin

I’m with you on the end goal, onchain should be fun and rewarding for creators. But the method matters

If people associate tokenization with getting sniped and dumped on, we lose them. We can teach people and design fair systems at the same time

i want to teach people to use the blockchain because it’s fun, and i want to teach creators to use the blockchain so they can get paid