Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Only in the US could we be required to pay into social security, a program that has a -4% return, and people still fight for it to exist.
7 replies
2 recasts
29 reactions
Chainleft
@chainleft
Or maybe it's intentionally sabotaged after decades of curtailing to result in -4% return. Because other countries are quite happy with their social security.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed
@eds
How was it sabotaged? It works pretty much how it was originally designed.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chainleft
@chainleft
Why does it work fine in other developed countries?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed
@eds
Also, it's hard to find data on this so it's a generalization, but individuals in other countries are much less likely to invest in stocks and mutual funds compared to Americans. Social security or pensions are the default.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed
@eds
I'd say, it doesn't. They have riots in France every couple years when necessary changes are made. Other developed countries are aging rapidly and the upcoming years won't be fun when they have to decide between raising retirement ages and raising taxes on the shrinking working-age population.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction