Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Serious Business
@ceresbzns
I need an Urbiter to come and fight me about their goddamn club. This screenshot is from their operator guide. In place of *actual* credible guarantees of sovereignty or privacy, users are still beholden to their service providers for their data! What the fuck! WHAT IS THE POINT
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
🌴tree.fail @ Bluesky
@tree
Urbit through hosting ever promised privacy or sovereignty? It's not black and white, it's a spectrum. Are you using a your own full-node to access Ethereum or are you using a centralized RPC providers?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Serious Business
@ceresbzns
I run my own full node.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
🌴tree.fail @ Bluesky
@tree
What about Farcaster? Do you also run your own hub? According to FID, you were here long before Farcaster was permission-less, and the centralization of whole system (esp. Warpcast) is quite apparent
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🌴tree.fail @ Bluesky
@tree
Personally, I've been interested in new decentralized networks for a long time. It's very interesting to watch Farcaster, Bluesky, Nostr, Lens and others... I'd be quite interested in your opinion on this. Because given how upset you are about Urbit, I wouldn't exactly expect you to be on Farcaster, to be honest.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Serious Business
@ceresbzns
The big difference between Farcaster and Urbit is a matter of proposed use case and value prop. 1) farcaster is free, so no one is asking me to invest money in it to participate 2) the core public-facing claims, as far as I'm aware, aren't contradicted by the operator docs and implementation
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Serious Business
@ceresbzns
Farcaster says "come here to chat with crypto people" and so far has delivered exactly that Urbit says "come here for a secure computer that will survive generations, but you have to pay us ETH" and then I skim one set of docs and it turns out it's neither secure nor especially robust
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
