Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
PSA for future "shock images" Warpcast will nerf folks for explicit images. It's not deterministic, our judgement. This isn't a court. - I'll ask the user to delete the cast - If they don't, I'll nerf on Warpcast To be clear: the cast exists at the protocol. Similar to websites, Google doesn't have to index you.
33 replies
6 recasts
91 reactions

timdaub 🥝/🫦 pfp
timdaub 🥝/🫦
@timdaub.eth
there you go alternative client developers, here is a real market Warpcast is not willing to serve explicitly
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
good luck finding an image hosting service
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

timdaub 🥝/🫦 pfp
timdaub 🥝/🫦
@timdaub.eth
ipfs is pretty good xD
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Hexidethmal 🟪 pfp
Hexidethmal 🟪
@hexidethmal
I have often wondered, but not looked into, how ipfs handles explicit content, and furthermore illegal content.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
IPFS hosts have blacklists and processes for handling reporting strict liability content
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions