Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
How many products are there where privacy is a core part of why it’s successful? I’m leaving scale of “success” ambiguous so I get more answers.
1 reply
1 recast
19 reactions

Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
Apple is imperfect on privacy but they do a better job than Google. Signal's core value prop is privacy. And of course, it's a big deal for Q 🙂, success will be a story told in time.
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Signal doesn’t make money though right? Feel like a public good doesn’t really count. Barely any of my friends stay when I force them to try, and when they change phones never install :/ I’m pro privacy, and in a lot of cases necessary for business value. Just think it isn’t enough to win the market.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
The difficulty of baking privacy into communication tools is that communication tools only have a stickiness as strong as their network effect. Privacy is rarely a motivating factor unless you understand why you need it, or retroactively wish you had it when you didn't and it mattered.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Agost Biro pfp
Agost Biro
@agostbiro
A small, intransigent minority can force the adoption of privacy preserving technology by leveraging the minority rule. I wrote about this in the context of Libra here: https://blog.agostbiro.net/2019/06/mapping-crypto-minority-rule/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction