Cassie Heart
@cassie
wait wait wait, the solana blinks thing people are talking about requires a browser extension to even render?
17 replies
2 recasts
242 reactions
grant 🌈 🎩 🐸
@grunt.eth
yeah, afaik it requires an injected browser extension they get all those permissions normally, to read/edit all data on all pages
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
Cassie Heart
@cassie
so you need a full fledged extension to support transaction interactions in the first place, and now need one (probably same one) to actively overwrite (and probably mangle) websites to support an interactive component that site operators might not even want, at what point does it continue making sense with the extension model rather than building a new browser? The raw security implications of completely overwriting a completely unrelated website, from user-supplied data, in the _same_ trust boundary as my crypto wallet steps way out of bounds for something I would remotely want to try.
4 replies
1 recast
19 reactions
conca 🎩💻
@0xconca.eth
i was aftaid to be the only one who thought it’s just a huge overengineering
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
grant 🌈 🎩 🐸
@grunt.eth
IMO it makes more sense in a dapp browser Like on a mobile wallet with a built in browser Taking us back to Mist wallet/browser!!!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Kartik
@slokh
They only render trusted actions for now, not everything. I think they fully understand the security implications and this seems to be the safest route for now.
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Impostor
@impostor
Are you not already using mobile wallets with built-in dapp browsers? Are they not complete ass? Interfacing with what I already use makes way more sense then trying to get me to use something new that is probably going to end up being dogshit.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
