politics

The /politics team has noticed an increase in spam posts in our channel recently. We want to ensure that our space remains a place for rational debates and discussions, but we also understand the concern with potentially limiting free speech, prioritizing voices that we align with, or making the channel biased.

We value your input and would like to know your thoughts on whether we should appoint moderators to help manage this channel.

The /politics team has noticed an increase in spam posts in our channel recently. We want to ensure that our space remains a place for rational debates and discussions, but we also understand the concern with potentially limiting free speech, prioritizing voices that we align with, or making the channel biased.

We value your input and would like to know your thoughts on whether we should appoint moderators to help manage this channel. https://frame.weponder.io/api/polls/5559

Political activist. Founder of mydemocracy.app and /advocacy. Host of the /politics channel. RCs may or may not = endorsements.

Can you share a few examples of what you & the team considered spam? That would be helpful to understand where the moderation line stands, and make a call on this.

/monad ecosystem growth | ex telco.in & everwave.xyz founder | /music moderator | writing on web3 & culture https://paragraph.xyz/@alixkun.eth

Right now, mostly just any posts that use the phrases "Check your $DEGEN points", "claim tokens", and "airdrop".

I think in the future, we might look into banning users who continue to make personal attacks against other users. But that would be a larger and later conversation.

Moderate/eliminate bots for sure. 

It’s a Grey area for “personal” attacks. Everyone takes their political views personal so could be difficult to regulate. 

Start with a warning. Move to a suspension. And last would be an outright ban.