Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
I’ll take an opposing view for the sake of the feed 🫡 “Never speak badly of others when they are not in your presence” implicitly benefits actors with reach, suppresses dissent, entrenches existing power dynamics, and reduces coordination for those who need it most under the guise of “pro-social behavior”
11 replies
1 recast
27 reactions
Rafaello.base.eth
@rafaello12
Are you saying it’s better to speak badly of people in their faces?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
no - i'm saying that if you're "not allowed" to speak badly of others without them present, then that disproportionately benefits people who have high social status/power because it is too costly (in terms of reputation) for low status people to critique them publicly
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rafaello.base.eth
@rafaello12
Thank you for clarifying your point, the idea that it benefits people who have high social status could lead to a lack of accountability for those in positions of power. How do you think we can form like a dialogue or critique without a toxic environment?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction