Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

erica pfp
erica
@heavygweit
if someone is banned from a channel they shouldn’t be able to post in it at all rn if someone is banned from a channel, they can still cast into it and it will show on your recent feed even if you don’t follow them sometimes and other folks you follow interact with the banned person’s content
8 replies
1 recast
57 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
for better or worse this is technically impossible with how cast architecture works (any cast can reply to any cast), but a moderator can set "no recent feed" for channels which effectively hides all unmoderated casts in the warpcast client and individuals can also mute the people they don't want to see casts from
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

kbc pfp
kbc
@kbc
that shifts the burden of discovering new voices to the channel owner. I'm assuming with no recent feed, even those selected as moderators using automod or another tool don't have access to the recent feed. So then channel curators (eg set of moderators in automod) are forced to use another app to review the channel feed and like posts. Only then they show up on main. But on other apps, users show up that you have already muted on Warpcast. Curators have to scan more casts to discover new voices. That feels like going back 6 months with a sprinkle of extra friction. Creating "cozy corners" is about curation. Part of curation is deciding what is in and what is out. IMO we need more ways to share between apps "who or what is out"
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Was mostly expressing the current technical reality of moderation with warpcast channels, not a value judgment on whether I like that’s what we have to work with tbh Agree basically on all, but would add that I sorta get the sense that merkle isn’t interested on supporting better team moderation in the near future
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions