If you find yourself writing a bullet point list and passing it to GPT to make a "proper" article, it's often better to just give people the bullet points.

The GPT adds "wordcel noise" that the reader has to struggle to extract useful info from more than it adds useful context.

(As usual, any AI-related advice has a life expectancy of ~6 months)

wordcel implies a degree of persuasive skill though?

That was the whole debate right? 

Evil wordcel people tricking innocent shape rotators into ceding control over important things to them?

LLMs definitely add words, but feels inaccurate to categorize them as wordcel

weird internet kid. word rotator. building /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /cameron + pdfproject.org | dev + vet + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

this is a good example of the difference between sharing information and telling a story

good storytellers will find a way to distinguish themselves from generated slop