Working through a mental model rn

1. Good content is harder to make than bad or stolen content

2. Given a quantity incentive w/o quality penalty, bad content will always proliferate faster

3. Quality is group specific and really hard to measure

So until you know what your group loves, rewards accelerate bad actors?

/cameron for content experiments. Helping Creators with /seemore. Yapping on /okbanger. Curating in /lounge. Dev + Veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

Not necessarily ‘bad actors’, just unproductive ones

Studying@cool uni
Interning@cool bank
Replyguying@farcaster

What do you mean?

Afaict those folks are v productive at growing their goal metric (farmed rewards)?

ahhhh

I think I classify some actors as explicitly bad and some as accidentally bad actors

Unproductive on a wider social scale if the group goal is quality content