Brian Kim pfp
Brian Kim
@brianjckim
i agree with this approach, but it wouldn't work with the current CT audience because 99% of people are here to get rich quickly this is why token sniping, uncapped allos are features not bugs. token launchpads wouldn't generate enough momentum to take off otherwise
4 replies
0 recast
19 reactions

Brian Kim pfp
Brian Kim
@brianjckim
cc @stephancill
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> it wouldn't work with the current CT audience because 99% of people are here to get rich quickly progress will be slow until this changes
1 reply
0 recast
16 reactions

Peter Kim pfp
Peter Kim
@peter
good take
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

᠎ pfp
@m-j-r.eth
what about subdividing this, as lotteries do, with discounted lump sum vs stream? people love the nebulous "pure play", it isn't bearish until it becomes market-tested. a majority of activity is "farming" for this. also, we neglect points as standing for "token-recycling events". instead, the flow is broken down to anticipatory periods, TGE, then rapid decay. imho, not enough discovery of transparent nontransferrable capital for the sake of driving intrinsic value of future redistribution. launchpads can always be closer to immaculate by enforcing dilution to more valuable capital (like PoW, but also social "legitimacy")
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction