Brian Kim pfp
Brian Kim
@brianjckim
i said this 18 months ago, and i’ll say it now if the ethereum ecosystem is serious about winning, it would go all-in on base
9 replies
1 recast
31 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
what does this mean practically? who should do what differently?
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

androidsixteen 🌲 pfp
androidsixteen 🌲
@androidsixteen.eth
Hasn’t it already?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jimmy😼 pfp
Jimmy😼
@jimmynorules
i think that’s bound to happen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

scottrepreneur pfp
scottrepreneur
@scottrepreneur.eth
In some ways yes. But also no. Competition among the L2s is exactly what's needed. Need interop between them to enhance UX back to unified Ethereum.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Koolkheart pfp
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
It’s definitely a bold move, but there’s a lot of potential in Base. It could be the key to scalability and user adoption for Ethereum. Still, we should tread carefully
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

souhl pfp
souhl
@souhl
All in, as in?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sai pfp
Sai
@saik
do you know base is selling all of the $ETH generated through fees?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Robbie pfp
Robbie
@robbie.eth
What does that mean exactly?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Eluksz pfp
Eluksz
@eluksz
I believe base is no 1 but eyes should be kept on other L2 as well
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction