brian is live on unlonely pfp
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
i hear a lot of founders say "in a gold rush, build shovels!". i don't think this analogy works in crypto. gold is gold, there's nothing to innovate with it. on the other hand, crypto social still has miles and miles of space to innovate. by the time you've built shovels for the gold, people will have realized the gold actually cures cancer, or can be used for space travel, or can be used for extremely novel online content experiences powered by livestreams and tokens.
6 replies
2 recasts
25 reactions

McBain pfp
McBain
@mcbain
Someone has to strike actual gold
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Bryhmo πŸ­πŸŽ©πŸ– pfp
Bryhmo πŸ­πŸŽ©πŸ–
@bryhmo
As you said ,there are always areas to innovate The analogy is both right and wrong depending on perspective
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

juanpriahitam.base.eth pfp
juanpriahitam.base.eth
@juanpriahitam
It all depends on buyyers lmao. if people buy then it's gold
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tudor 🟣🟑 pfp
Tudor 🟣🟑
@tudorizer
This applies to the wider context of software, I would say. Trends have always emerged in history and because of its creative nature, people have tried to build tangential tools to support or amplify said trend. Shovels and gold are limited by physical matter. Software is not (to a certain extent)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Johnson pfp
Johnson
@johnson
I'm not sure what exactly should we understand by the shovel here. But supporting infras sometimes becomes more profitable than the actual product itself. Imo Neynar is a good example. Used by a ton of products building on FC. A good example of a shovel that found pmf πŸ€“.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

BJ pfp
BJ
@azzabazazz
Bingo. Analogical thinking is woefully unsuited for purpose in innovation spaces. Better to construct theories of the use case from first principles than β€œan Apple is like a fire truck because they’re both red, shiny, and my 4 year old likes them.”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction