Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
there’s a clear lack of conversation around the channels stuff on farcaster. echo chambers are bad and we do a disservice to farcaster long term if we: - always agree 100% with what @dwr.eth says and does / dont hold people accountable - are afraid to speak out about things, specifically the larger accounts here
29 replies
2 recasts
41 reactions
Q🎩
@qsteak.eth
Bankless should have the channel “for the greater good” but they should have had to pay a premium. Squatters suck, but that’s part of an open free market no?
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
agreed. why didn’t bankless make the channel earlier? why do they get it now?
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
David Hoffman
@trustlessstate
I think it would have been less justified had the squatter actually been using the channel and growing a community in it Instead, there was a single “placeholder” cast, and no other activity. No one feels aggrieved except for this one guy who thought that he could get $50k from us
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
I mean we can agree this user behaved as a squatter and acted as one, doing minimal work of being early for max returns dans gonna make fun of me for this but it does set a dangerous precedent where’s the line? where Dan says it should be.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
David Hoffman
@trustlessstate
Isn’t “the line” the explicitly stated moment that warpcast makes this a permissionless part of the protocol, and this *cant* happen at all We’re just not there yet
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
