Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
there’s a clear lack of conversation around the channels stuff on farcaster. echo chambers are bad and we do a disservice to farcaster long term if we: - always agree 100% with what @dwr.eth says and does / dont hold people accountable - are afraid to speak out about things, specifically the larger accounts here
29 replies
2 recasts
44 reactions
Q🎩
@qsteak.eth
Bankless should have the channel “for the greater good” but they should have had to pay a premium. Squatters suck, but that’s part of an open free market no?
6 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
a1z2
@a1z2
Yeah but what about channels in its current architecture suggests it’s an asset on some public ledger rather than a feature on a centralized client?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dennison Bertram
@dennison
is there a link to this going on? whats the DRAMA?!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
agree @bankless should’ve bought the channel. they need to walk the walk more than they talk the talk. but sets a bad precedent. if we want farcaster to succeed, we need brands to be building their communities here. if every brand has to fight for their channel name, they’re not gonna come. then we all lose.
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
agreed. why didn’t bankless make the channel earlier? why do they get it now?
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
Paloo
@paloo
Exactly my thoughts. Good take. Also, why Dan had to do this dirty job and not let Bankless negotiate directly to this guy? 👀
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
milan 🎩🍖🎭
@dermilan.eth
wait didn't they just get like 400k from optimism RPGF? 😅
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
