Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

brian is live on unlonely pfp
brian is live on unlonely
@briang
a lotta people in crypto build downstream of things with the goal of "helping people do X in crypto". there's nothing wrong with this approach, but it fundamentally lacks that dog. instead, have a vision of what people should be doing onchain and execute.
12 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

agusti 🐘 pfp
agusti 🐘
@bleu.eth
nobody would have asked steve jobs for an iphone as people would have asked just for faster horses to ford
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

notdevin  pfp
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
People will read this then still go back to what they’re working on and decide to follow the lead of someone else and blame it on what others will expect To follow this advice, as you should, you must dare to disagree, do so with conviction and potentially without support
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

shrilan 🎩 pfp
shrilan 🎩
@shrilan
I agree. Many people in crypto focus on the "how" rather than the "why." It's better to develop solutions with a clear vision of what users should be doing in crypto.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sam (crazy candle person) ✦  pfp
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
Put this in good takes It’s not that it lacks the dog it’s that they’re building infrastructure for customers who don’t exist yet You need the dog before you create the infra eg warpcast
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

totty 🔥🧶 pfp
totty 🔥🧶
@totty.eth
this is a masterful example of posting i’m still thinking about it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

totty 🔥🧶 pfp
totty 🔥🧶
@totty.eth
based
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

‎ pfp
@king
Building infrastructure is a pain, building for retail seems more fun.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Shaya pfp
Shaya
@shaya
see it, be it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

@AT ❌ pfp
@AT ❌
@at
Kill shot Sorry @king
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

tyler ↑? pfp
tyler ↑?
@trh
The “_____, but onchain” mindset is a different (sometimes shallow, opportunistic, etc.) dog for sure, but necessary to bridge the gap. It can’t be *just* analogies, but there must be analogies.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction