Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joan Westenberg
@daojoan.eth
for what it's worth - blocking someone isn’t denying them their right to speak. It’s asserting your right not to listen.
10 replies
21 recasts
49 reactions
Joan Westenberg
@daojoan.eth
if there’s one hill I’m prepared to die on it’s that nobody on Farcaster should be forced to put up with my shit
2 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
Breck Yunits
@breck
i would be horrified if people could mute me. i annoy the shit out of myself. like, go touch grass more guy. but muting solves that. blocking is for censorship, very simple.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joan Westenberg
@daojoan.eth
Blocking on an individual level does not meet the definition of censorship.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Breck Yunits
@breck
What about the fact that these 4 people preventing communication (my constructive criticism comments) from being seen or made available to the public is not censorship?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Joan Westenberg
@daojoan.eth
you can still post your critiques on twitter though. you can post them, name the people they’re about, and tell people their handles even if youre being blocked. so your ability to speak isn’t being silenced.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Saadiq
@saadiq
Maybe we need to define our terms. If I were to block you, I deny you the ability to see what I write. If I mute you, I deny myself the ability to see what you write. No one but the platform has the ability to deny others the ability to see what you write. Are we in agreement there? Or are you asserting that you have an inalienable right to take part in everyone else’s discussions?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
