daos

DAOs getting close to full-stack for org essentials
- identity (address)
- multi-sig (simple group decisions)
- governance contracts (complicated group decisions)
- hatsProtocol (org structure AND org related agreements)
- ??? (general agreements btwn orgs/parties that aren't structure related)

@teamSobol
DAOin’ w/ @dimoDAO, @hatsprotocol
Alum: @banklesssDAO, CityDAO, PolygonDAO

most important part is index of agreements and graph of related parties.
why I'm thinking about it so much is because @hatsprotocol did this for org structure with their modules, but there's a next layer emerging now that Hats is here.

There are primitives to agreements (e.g. 0xSplit - RevShare Agreement) but there isn't a way to bundle them together, define parties executing, and plug into onchain governance (think web3 docusign that routes executable onchain contracts to onchain decision mechanisms)

What type of agreements are you thinking about for the ??? line? Can you give a couple examples?

yeoro.eth → db.team → /slc → SuperBenefitDAO, All in For Sport → "purpose aligned networks of small autonomous teams”

SuperBenefit always pushing the new frontier!

At SuperBenefit we're using the concept of 'State' for entities that are networked through agreements. Each entity (down to the level of a team) has a State that holds it's core internal and external agreement making a decentralised structure possible. Mapping the States of all the entities reveals the structure.

Independent, original thoughts. Onchain interests. Investor, entrepreneur, best-selling author. Cultur3. MetaCartel Ventures DAO. Opinions are my own.

widely accepted structures for limiting liabilities arising from DAO activities is still something that needs work on I think