daos

DAOs getting close to full-stack for org essentials
- identity (address)
- multi-sig (simple group decisions)
- governance contracts (complicated group decisions)
- hatsProtocol (org structure AND org related agreements)
- ??? (general agreements btwn orgs/parties that aren't structure related)

@teamSobol
DAOin’ w/ @dimoDAO, @hatsprotocol
Alum: @banklesssDAO, CityDAO, PolygonDAO

There are primitives to agreements (e.g. 0xSplit - RevShare Agreement) but there isn't a way to bundle them together, define parties executing, and plug into onchain governance (think web3 docusign that routes executable onchain contracts to onchain decision mechanisms)

Organizations work better with Hats. Save time, automate onboarding, and make better decisions with programmable onchain roles.

most important part is index of agreements and graph of related parties.
why I'm thinking about it so much is because @hatsprotocol did this for org structure with their modules, but there's a next layer emerging now that Hats is here.

web3 citizen and Open Source Software enjoyer

Yes. It makes sense that we need to fully extend all the node related stuff first and then we’ll be ready to explore connections and edges more explicitly. I’m keen to see is speed run it though because the end game is beautiful full fledged organizations.

There were some interesting early convos on this in the Hats Community ("Threads Protocol"), which kinda just devolved into Dudes Arguing Online...

Agreements are the foundation of consentual relationships, and without them we have a "network" with all nodes, no edges.

This feels so absolutely necessary in every way.