Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
DAO tooling is such a nerd snipe CT nerds can sense the potential for it, it's fun to design and build, no one (yet) seems to have substantive willingness to pay for it. This will change.
5 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
Trigs
@trigs
I'm seeing some pretty substantive inflows for DAO tooling in smaller niche areas. I think the problem is most devs building tooling want to throw some contracts up and think ppl will just figure out how to use them. Devs that are funded and building for a specific use case and onboarding the users directly are shipping more useful tools.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
Please say this louder. Devs seem to trivialize the internal work neccesary for onchain orgs (esp social orgs) to adopt web3 tools. Tools like Hats Protocol are great, but seem to neglect the reality that most orgs aren't able to easily rolecraft as needed or sensemake around org structures/relationships
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Trigs
@trigs
It is surprisingly hard to do the internal work! Spot on about hats, I have an org I would love to use hats with, but they aren't ready yet to do that work. I will say, however, another org I'm working with that IS ready to do that work has simply hired the Hats team to join us for the process!
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
These replies made my day. Was huge Govrn fan. My OP is hyperbolic, but you’re in the heart of it in the replies. The nascent nature which drives the ‘crawl out of the bespoke sponsor’ go-to-market strategy is valid, but a tough pathway for founders to grind on.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Trigs
@trigs
I so appreciate your experience and mentoring in this chaotic whirlpool while newbies like me run a crash course of all the lessons you've already learned!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
