Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
DAOs getting close to full-stack for org essentials - identity (address) - multi-sig (simple group decisions) - governance contracts (complicated group decisions) - hatsProtocol (org structure AND org related agreements) - ??? (general agreements btwn orgs/parties that aren't structure related)
4 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
There are primitives to agreements (e.g. 0xSplit - RevShare Agreement) but there isn't a way to bundle them together, define parties executing, and plug into onchain governance (think web3 docusign that routes executable onchain contracts to onchain decision mechanisms)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

rathermercurial pfp
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
There were some interesting early convos on this in the Hats Community ("Threads Protocol"), which kinda just devolved into Dudes Arguing Online... Agreements are the foundation of consentual relationships, and without them we have a "network" with all nodes, no edges. This feels so absolutely necessary in every way.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
Yes. It makes sense that we need to fully extend all the node related stuff first and then we’ll be ready to explore connections and edges more explicitly. I’m keen to see is speed run it though because the end game is beautiful full fledged organizations.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction