Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Linda Xie pfp
Linda Xie
@linda
Re: "why don't you hire someone to do X" comments for Bountycaster, in my opinion: - being resource constrained with 2 people forces us to work on the highest priority items. Easy to fall into having people work on random stuff just because you can - hiring more people creates more work too (recruiting, managing, etc) - we're bootstrapped, hiring people requires more funding. This is also more work and changes dynamics (fundraising, managing investors, etc) - we want our team size / burn to be in line with the market opportunity right now and we don't feel it's justified yet to hire more - one of the highest ROI things a founder can be doing early on is being constantly in touch with users, not something I want to be delegating away at our stage
46 replies
8 recasts
98 reactions

Dvyne pfp
Dvyne
@dummie.eth
Bountycaster on X would be a next level stuff for them though I would say an intern would be nice to control and increase the demand in bountycaster but your choice For me, whilst being on here, it still took some time before i got to know about bountycaster. Marketing sounds like something much needed for an amazing tool like this, especially in the jobs section
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Bountycaster pfp
Bountycaster
@bountycaster
This is Linda - I'm fortunate to have one of the largest reach accounts on Farcaster already and have a large reach on Twitter, hiring for marketing is not the priority. If we were to hire anyone it would be another engineer to increase shipping
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dvyne pfp
Dvyne
@dummie.eth
Alrighty Makes sense
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction