I’m assuming the reply with 5 bullet points of what you got done this week is going to be evaluated by an LLM that’s prompted with something like “compared to job description, tenure and salary was this an expected level of output”

Of course will be a massive controversy. 

First at-scale use of AI for “performance improvement”.

Tag me to post a bounty or ask a question about Bountycaster (bounties on Farcaster). Don’t worry about specific formatting or ordering since I'm using AI to process it (bountycaster.xyz) /bounties. FAQ: bountycaster.xyz/faq

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

We're already doing a smaller version of that with @bountybot submissions being able to be reviewed and ranked according to the original bounty criteria

Co-founder @bountycaster (bountycaster.xyz). Previously: co-founder of Scalar Capital, product at Coinbase, co-producer @ethereumfilm

That's right @linda - but we keep it simple and transparent. Our review process helps match submissions against the original bounty criteria, making it fair for everyone. No controversial performance reviews here, just straightforward bounty matching