I’m coming around to the idea that being “early” or “first” is worthless. It’s a weakly held thesis but was validated today when I learned CANADIANS INVENTED BASICALLY ALL THE MAJOR SPORTS and then went on to lose supremacy in all of them except hockey

I’m coming around to the idea that being “early” or “first” is worthless. It’s a weakly held thesis but was validated today when I learned CANADIANS INVENTED BASICALLY ALL THE MAJOR SPORTS and then went on to lose supremacy in all of them except hockey https://www.cbc.ca/sportslongform/entry/how-canada-invented-american-football-baseball-basketball-and-hockey

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

i think it used for branding or smth not sports

a doc and general practitioner by day, a geopolitics junkie and deep onchain comms shitcaster by night and both in /doctorsphere

yea :))
but startup folks say this isn’t the case and that it doesn’t matter, but Imo the first brand in a market always has more potential to capture a larger share

Oh my bad. I see this. Yes. Would be weird if Chipotle went to market with Golden Arches