Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cyrus
@cyrus
So the prize pool is going to be shared equally between the #1 token with ~95% of the liquidity and #10 token that has erm <1% of the liquidity... either people don't understand the game, or the outflows from $airdrop are going to be enormous once people 'get it'
2 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
alex
@proxystudio.eth
why? $AIRDROP is guaranteed, whereas any significant outflow from Airdrop to other tokens will result in the token losing the #10 spot by attracting TOO much interest
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cyrus
@cyrus
if i understand correctly the total prize pool is split 50% to project #1 (currently 99% of holders) and 50% to project #10 (currently <1% of holders) so the few project #10 holders will share a great deal of value, while the airdrop holders and those who bought in get more than 0 but still lose.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
yes, I just think its much harder to speculate on #10 because as soon as people are interested and get exposure it will move up in holders / mc
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
matt ↑ ᖽ
@blueish
yea agreed. ‘Playing to lose to win’ seems midwit. Most left curve approach is just hold $AIRDROP right?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cyrus
@cyrus
it's insanely left curve to just hold $airdrop yes think it's actually the best strategy LT as the token might end up having some utility in the game, or at least it's just the 1st winning coin etc
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
matt ↑ ᖽ
@blueish
have been called insanely left curve a time or two lol. the $airdrop airdrop was necessary to seed interest/liquidity but skewed the game. Play to lose to win is a strat when there’s relatively even playing field amongst the top 10, maybe in the next round?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cyrus
@cyrus
insanely left curve is the best kind - massive compliment if anything play-to-lose-to-win for future rounds is everything
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
