Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
this is one of the reflections i have after trying to build consensus around $nouns for the past few weeks / months it’s just very hard which made me wonder what things you really need dao consensus for. if you need funding or you need the dao to deploy then ofc but maybe $nouns could get started without?
6 replies
3 recasts
33 reactions

Bixbite 👽  pfp
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
Anyone can create a contract to allow Nouns to fractionalize themselves into $NOUNS, but the whole point I thought was wanting it to be canonical, which indeed would need consensus & voting…. V3 & rage quit makes $NOUNS a potential attack vector on the treasury, so I don’t think it should be done without consensus.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Bixbite 👽  pfp
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
or at least lower the fork threshold to allow people to exit and leave before $NOUNS gets stealth launched (if it gets decided to implement without consensus)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction