Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
david
@davidbr
Looking for feedback on a model for protocol rewards compensation. V1 will reward for proposals, voting & auction bids. The model shows which knobs the DAO has and how that translates into the comp that a clients can get Is something unclear? Do you suggestions for improvement? https://tinyurl.com/rewards-model
6 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
Not really sure this makes sense because not all proposals are creating software, for instance a prop to increase fork threshold does not need to be rewarded as it has no ongoing costs, same with the Nouns gift props.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Neokry
@neokry
it’s a reward for clients that are sourcing props and votes. the developers of the clients are receiving the rewards
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
david
@davidbr
thanks for clarifying that. sorry it wasn't clear!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
I think I’m more confused …. Correct me if I’m wrong. So we want to get rid of Nouns.wtf and replace it with 3 new front ends (clients) who will all be displaying the same info & we are rewarding them on the low end 100eth a year? …. Surely server costs & maintenance are not that expensive?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
I guess I’m just confused why we would be moving away from Nouns.wtf in the first place …. We spent $53M on props that have marketing that push to that website. It has SEO and is already indexed with high rankings, why would we ever want to get rid of that?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
david
@davidbr
Please try to stay focus not on the knob values, but on the machine. The DAO can decide how many clients it wants, and how much to spend on that. The numbers in the models are just placeholders.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
