Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite š½
@bixbite
I think itās kind of funny that the 10% threshold prop didnāt passā¦. Why is it funny? Because for the last year many have been claiming weāre āunder attack from the big bad arbersā & that āarbers have been accumulatingā ā¦. Well guess what, if there were any arbers donāt you think they would have voted FOR the proposal to lower threshold so they could get out early š As I said, weāre scared of a boogie monster under our bed which doesnāt exist. š¤¦š¼āāļø Iād say run it back for 15% @coleperkins & let the honest majority leave if there would even be 106 Nouns to enterā¦. Letās remember only 28 votes FOR, so it maybe unlikely to even get 106.
5 replies
2 recasts
21 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
> Iād say run it back for 15% ya the problem with this is I don't think there would even be enough of an honest minority to get to 15% -- even 10% seems challenging
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite š½
@bixbite
Yea I just think it looks better for optics if the DAO isnāt trying to act as a blocker for an honest minority exitā¦ if there were truly arbers waiting in the wings with all of these new anon wallets they would have come out to vote the 10% through. That clearly didnāt happen.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Yea, which is why a low threshold seems like a fine idea since thereās a smaller minority to protect, even 5% seems fine imo Obviously the āthis will ruin dunaā camp has a valid point though too if it truly does ruin odds of duna
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
