Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🗿
@bias
here’s how we settle the Ai outputs debate once and for all: if I tell you to paint a picture of a dog and then you do, did I create art?
16 replies
0 recast
33 reactions
brennen
@brennen.eth
Everything is art if it has intention
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
🗿
@bias
This is a very generous outlook that I'm not sure I am capable of. lol
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
brennen
@brennen.eth
I think what you really want to say is, what makes good art? Art that can last a generation or multi generations. I'd say 99% of art created today can't and won't do that.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🗿
@bias
I think what I'm reaching at is agency, and whether or not an artist is directly creating what they are calling their artwork or whether they are leaving a lot of the work up to a middleman/interpreter/agent.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
brennen
@brennen.eth
I think it's like a disabled person who uses someone to help facilitate what's in their mind. Again, intention for wanting to spend time to produce some output. However, how it's subjectively graded is very different. I'd say most AI art is bad, but I also think most art is bad haha
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🗿
@bias
Okay, I’m in some agreement with you. Now, if someone takes a Polaroid, do we automatically call that photography or even art?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
brennen
@brennen.eth
What's a Polaroid and can I upload it to TikTok?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🗿
@bias
You ever watch the birthday boys?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
brennen
@brennen.eth
Sketch comedy?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
