antimeme

here’s how we settle the Ai outputs debate once and for all:

if I tell you to paint a picture of a dog and then you do, did I create art?

Bias Research Ltd. • fartist 
De-di-designer, autodidact. 🗿 UX AI/ML  • Channeling @punk • 
punk.energy 🫧 /punk • dont let your /antimeme ‘s stay dreams

I like pixels and scribbles, building /tavern  ⌐◨-◨  テ Φ

This is a very generous outlook that I'm not sure I am capable of. lol

I think what you really want to say is, what makes good art? Art that can last a generation or multi generations. I'd say 99% of art created today can't and won't do that.

I think what I'm reaching at is agency, and whether or not an artist is directly creating what they are calling their artwork or whether they are leaving a lot of the work up to a middleman/interpreter/agent.

I think it's like a disabled person who uses someone to help facilitate what's in their mind. Again, intention for wanting to spend time to produce some output. However, how it's subjectively graded is very different. I'd say most AI art is bad, but I also think most art is bad haha

What's a Polaroid and can I upload it to TikTok?

Okay, I’m in some agreement with you. Now, if someone takes a Polaroid, do we automatically call that photography or even art?